Re: Expression-local variables and 'let'

Quoting Daniel Bonniot <[email protected]>:

> >   for (i: 1..10){}
> >  
> >
> Yes, but that's also problematic. In that case it's feasible, because 
> for(_ : _) is special syntax. I still don't like it because it's 
> inconsistent with the rest of the syntax.

So, why don't you take this special construct out? I agree it is ugly and
doesn't fit with the rest of the language.

It's your language, after all!

- Brian
(advocate of the removable of everything anybody could think is a useful
shortcut for anything)




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click