Re: syntax puzzle

"Hendrik Boom [email protected] [ocaml_beginners]" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.ocaml.beginners
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:41:13AM +0200, 'Mr. Herr' [email protected] [ocaml_beginners] wrote:
> 
> 
> On 22.06.2015 20:00, Hendrik Boom [email protected] [ocaml_beginners] wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:40:20PM +0000, Dario Teixeira
> >[email protected] [ocaml_beginners] wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> > I see. It seems like a bizarre language restriction, but I suppose
> >> > I'll have to live with it. One of the joys of OCaml was always that it
> >> > *didn't* have this kind of restriction.
> >>
> >>
> >> Then you'll be happy to know that the current OCaml SVN trunk already
> >> supports inline records for constructor arguments, just as you wanted!
> >> See the link below for the full discussion:
> >> http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5528
> >
> >Yes, it is good to hear that.
> >
> >But evidently the version that arrived on my computer with Debian isn't
> >that up-to-date. I have ocalm 4.01.0-5. How should I go about
> >replacing it with the new one; where to get the new one; other
> >questions of that nature?
> >
> >Or is it likely to reach Debian in a few days anyway?
> >
> >Ah. 4.02.1-3 is probably the one I want, and It's already in
> >Debian experimental, marked as "experimental (rc-buggy)". I wonder if
> >"release-critical-buggy" is just what they say of every package in
> >"experimental" or if there's some special proble here. I suppose I have
> >to watch out for version skew with any other bits of ocaml I have lying
> >around...
> >
> In case you overlooked it:
> 
> the link to Mantis says "fixed in 4.03.0", but we are at 4.02.2,
> released around June 16th,
> so still a long way to go.

Definitely missed it.

-- hendrik

> 
> If you use opam read about the opam switch command - you can switch to compiler versions.

I have used opam.  Will investigate, thanks.

> 
> /Str.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.