Re: Page 76 of OCaml by John Whitington ???
"Douglas Lewit [email protected] [ocaml_beginners]" <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:02:51 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ocaml.beginners |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAM0XMJQxc2C0UG-GPEBW87v3QG=937beSNcZP8eYYNJz+dD=sw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Hendrik. I'll have to find that paper by Peter Landin. The author's name is strongly familiar, but right now I can't quite place it. My AI professor said that LISP and other functional programming languages are great for AI, but I didn't quite get his explanation. ( And to be fair, his explanation was pretty short and quick. ) Something about how AI requires the manipulation of symbolic values ( as in computer algebra ) and for that sort of thing functional programming is better suited than other programming paradigms. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Hendrik Boom [email protected] [ocaml_beginners] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:49:44AM -0500, Douglas Lewit [email protected] > [ocaml_beginners] wrote: > > > > > P.S. I almost forgot. Is LISP considered the great granddaddy of all > > functional programming languages? Is it correct to say that OCaml is > > descended from LISP? Thanks for the feedback. > > I'd say so, yes. > > Since you are asking about history, perhaps you'd like some: > > One of the important papers, while not explicitly about functional > programming, that liberated functional programming from LISP was > "The Next 700 Programming Languages", by Peter Landin. > > -- hendrik > >