Re: Re: SIGSEGV with lablgtk for GTK+ 2

From: Brian de Alwis <[email protected]>

> Your patch seems to have fixed mldonkey.  I've never actually used
> the program, so can't be certain that it's 100% functional, but
> the UI displays and I'm able to select different panes and view
> some complicated graphs.

OK, I've now commited the change.
Note that I use the following definitions instead of noops:
#define GType_val(t) ((GType)Addr_val(t))
#define Val_GType    Val_addr

This is just in case ocaml give a special meaning to low address
pointers, but this should be still ok as they do not shift, but only
mark.

Thanks again for your helpful reports.

Jacques