Threads, lablgtk and lablglade
Luca Saiu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ocaml.lib.gtk |
|---|---|
| Organization | LIPN |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Sorry for bothering you with a possibly stupid question, but I really have no clue on this, while you might recognize my mistake. We are working on a relatively complex OCaml application, Marionnet (http://www.marionnet.org), which uses lablgtk and lablglade with threads. Scenario: we need the main application to communicate with an external daemon providing some services; we use Unix sockets. The daemon closes the socket to a client when it doesn't receive keep-alive messages often enough. Our problem is this: *whenever* the main application is displaying a dialog built with Glade, the thread sending keepalives blocks and only unblocks after the window is closed. Of course this defeats the while purpose of keepalives. This does *not* happen with windows not built with Glade. I think it's extremely unlikely that this is a synchronization bug. It would be possible for me to stop using keepalives and adopt a different strategy, but I would like to know if a clean solution exists; and I'm getting curious. Do you have any idea of a possible cause of this problem? Ever heard of something similar? We use Debian packages for lablgtk, and OCaml 3.10.1. Thanks in advance, and (especially) thanks for your nice software. - -- Luca Saiu http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon Marionnet: http://www.marionnet.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH9RBrvzOavibF0oYRApa8AKCj3a3sgAQIYA/bdThUHzEzd/AerACeKeBU tOe/h/2UZc/UBOqT3gZhUAU= =b+Ra -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----