Re: Whither Bio::FeatureIO?

Cool!  I guess I could probably announce this as being released at some point now :)

chris

PS - I may have a decent test environment set up for longer-term evaluation, but it would be nice to see if we can get something working with travis-ci or a smoker setup, just so I can check whether the main branch refactoring is clobbering chado (as I suspect it is).

On Sep 16, 2014, at 1:50 PM, George Hartzell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Hi All,

It took a while, but I was finally able to run my little litmus test and the good news is that it appears to pass.

I modified my ansible playbook that implements the steps described in INSTALL.Chado<https://svn.code.sf.net/p/gmod/svn/schema/trunk/chado/INSTALL.Chado> so that it uses the version of Bio::FeatureIO that is now on CPAN instead of pulling the github master.

The resulting installation ran to completion and then was able to load the yeast gff3 file:

cp /vagrant/saccharomyces_cerevisiae.gff .
gmod_gff3_preprocessor.pl<http://gmod_gff3_preprocessor.pl/> --gfffile saccharomyces_cerevisiae.gff --outfile saccharomyces_cerevisiae.sorted.gff
gmod_bulk_load_gff3.pl<http://gmod_bulk_load_gff3.pl/> --organism yeast  --gfffile saccharomyces_cerevisiae.gff.sorted


and the resulting database seems to be stitched together reasonably (though I’m not a particularly informed judge of its character).

@chris thanks for the help on this!!!!

g.

​

On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 9:24 PM, George Hartzell <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Fields, Christopher J writes:
 > Just a quick update on this: I released a separate Bio::FeatureIO
 > release to CPAN that represents the code split out from the core
 > modules:
 >
 >    https://metacpan.org/pod/Bio::FeatureIO
 >
 > I had to do some cleanup to get code to work and tests passing with
 > some sanity.  A *lot* of things were not passing tests when we
 > moved this over.
 >
 > This should represent what was last working with Chado though.
 > However, I haven’t officially announced anything yet b/c I would
 > like to shake bugs out of it. Can either of you try this out on a
 > Chado run to make sure everything is up to snuff (or at least point
 > out issues)?  Time depending, I would like to get something running
 > on (for instance) Travis-CI, maybe including some optional
 > Chado-related stuff.  This would also help so that we can work on
 > merging what has been done on master so that these pass the same
 > tests.

I can't do anything until Tuesday, but will be happy to run it through
the standard Chado build process when I get back to work.

Thanks for digging into it.

g.

_______________________________________________
Bioperl-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l