Re: Conversion of Phred 33 -> Phred 64 quality
Peter Cock <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_6DH+tOrrwXSWhsA54MXTS3QpPtxr3vOy3NXJuY4RG45w@mail.gmail.com> |
Yes, BioPerl's SeqIO understands the two legacy formats "fastq-solexa" and "fastq-illumina" plus the original and now universal standard "fastq-sanger". See also http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137 Peter On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Mark A. Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks, > I know I could RTFM, but maybe someone knows off the top of their head: I > understand that Illumina at one time made a switch in the constant added to > quality scores to generate the FASTQ that comes off their instruments. This > leads to a certain incomparability of data before and after that switch. > This is about all I know of the issue; does anyone here have experience with > this? Are there any BP modules that do this translation? > much appreciated- > MAJ > _______________________________________________ > Bioperl-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l