Re: Conversion of Phred 33 -> Phred 64 quality

+1

Though, see my more detailed reply.  There are performance issues that need to be addressed.

chris

> On Jan 26, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes, BioPerl's SeqIO understands the two legacy formats "fastq-solexa"
> and "fastq-illumina" plus the original and now universal standard
> "fastq-sanger".
> 
> See also http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp1137
> 
> Peter
> 
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Mark A. Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> I know I could RTFM, but maybe someone knows off the top of their head: I
>> understand that Illumina at one time made a switch in the constant added to
>> quality scores to generate the FASTQ that comes off their instruments. This
>> leads to a certain incomparability of data before and after that switch.
>> This is about all I know of the issue; does anyone here have experience with
>> this? Are there any BP modules that do this translation?
>> much appreciated-
>> MAJ
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l