Re: perldoc pages
"Fields, Christopher J" <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:39:23 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I believe these were autogenerated from the POD, I would have to look at the wayback machine to work out what was used (I think it was pdoc: http://pdoc.sourceforge.net). My suggestion is to file this as a request on the github page for the website: https://github.com/bioperl/bioperl.github.io. I would say it’s not a certainty to return; there are easier ways of autogenerating content these days (e.g. Readthedocs), and pdoc doesn’t look like it’s been updated in about 11 yrs. chris On 2/20/17, 2:35 AM, "Bioperl-l on behalf of Daniel Lang" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > >if we already dwelling in bioperl history - where did the classical >perldoc pages for all the modules go? The ones I could find under: >http://doc.bioperl.org/ > >I preferred them so much over using CPAN to look up my favorite >functions name or its return values... > >Thank you all for keeping bioperl alive and kicking! > >Best, >Daniel > >_______________________________________________ >Bioperl-l mailing list >[email protected] >http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l _______________________________________________ Bioperl-l mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l