Re: perldoc pages
Daniel Lang <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Feb 2017 15:31:28 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Plant Biotechnology |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks, Chris. Filed an issue on https://github.com/bioperl/bioperl.github.io. Best, Daniel Am 20.02.2017 um 15:39 schrieb Fields, Christopher J: > I believe these were autogenerated from the POD, I would have to look at the wayback machine to work out what was used (I think it was pdoc: http://pdoc.sourceforge.net). > > > > My suggestion is to file this as a request on the github page for the website: https://github.com/bioperl/bioperl.github.io. I would say it’s not a certainty to return; there are easier ways of autogenerating content these days (e.g. Readthedocs), and pdoc doesn’t look like it’s been updated in about 11 yrs. > > chris > > On 2/20/17, 2:35 AM, "Bioperl-l on behalf of Daniel Lang" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> if we already dwelling in bioperl history - where did the classical >> perldoc pages for all the modules go? The ones I could find under: >> http://doc.bioperl.org/ >> >> I preferred them so much over using CPAN to look up my favorite >> functions name or its return values... >> >> Thank you all for keeping bioperl alive and kicking! >> >> Best, >> Daniel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioperl-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l _______________________________________________ Bioperl-l mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l