Re: New distribution Bio-Tools-Phylo-PAML

I personally think splitting these out into a separate PAML-specific distribution is a great idea, variations with PAML has always been hard to keep up with.  I’ll have a look at the documentation as well, if there is a way to do this for each Bio::Tools application it paves the way for combining the wrappers and parsers into separate distributions if needed.

Jason, you’re listed as key contributor for bioperl PAML development, any thoughts?  

Chris

> On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:12 PM, Carnë Draug <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I have been preparing a new distribution for Bio::Tools::Phylo::PAML
> and related modules [1] which I would like to make a release of.
> 
> To avoid clashes with existing installations, I would like to have a
> new release of bioperl-live and bioperl-run soon.  Is this possible?
> I already have commits ready for bioperl-live and bioperl-run that
> will remove the files.
> 
> On a related topic, I updated the instructions on how to prepare a new
> perl distribution from a subset of modules [2] and made a new release
> of the bioperl distzilla plugin bundle [3] (will take a few hours
> before it is indexed in metacpan).
> 
> Carnë
> 
> [1] https://github.com/bioperl/Bio-Tools-Phylo-PAML
> [2] http://bioperl.org/howtos/split-new-distribution.html
> [3] https://metacpan.org/pod/Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::BioPerl


_______________________________________________
Bioperl-l mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l