RE: [code-review] Re: Tie::Array::Sorted

Likewise, all info is good for upgrades.
There's nothing stopping the author from improving the module and =
putting up a better version later, is there?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: code-review-ladder-admin-wool9L35kiek0rBIEb6pKdBc4/[email protected]
> [mailto:code-review-ladder-admin-wool9L35kiek0rBIEb6pKdBc4/[email protected]]On Behalf Of
> Xavier Noria
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 5:31 PM
> To: code-review-ladder-wool9L35kiek0rBIEb6pKdBc4/[email protected]
> Subject: [code-review] Re: Tie::Array::Sorted
>=20
>=20
>=20
> El viernes, 14 novi, 2003, a las 00:12 Europe/Madrid, Nicholas Clark=20
> escribi=F3:
>=20
> > On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:52:16PM +0000, Simon Cozens wrote:
> >
> >> The module's already uploaded, guys; the thread is dead.
> >
> > The module was uploaded within 3 hours of you posting the original=20
> > message.
> > (but that doesn't seem to have stopped anyone for the past 2 days)
>=20
> A module can be discussed whether published or not. You cannot expect=20
> to receive a good amount of feedback in three hours, so that=20
> discussion=20
> seemed on topic even given the fact that an initial version=20
> was already=20
> uploaded.
>=20
> -- fxn
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> code-review-ladder mailing list
> code-review-ladder-wool9L35kiek0rBIEb6pKdBc4/[email protected]
> http://lists.netthink.co.uk/listinfo/code-review-ladder
>=20

*****
"The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity =
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, =
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination =
or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this =
information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is =
prohibited.  If you received this in error, please contact the sender =
and delete the material from all computers." 117