RE: [code-review] WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C
"Hodges, Paul" <Paul.Hodges-ntWzkUHD06N8olp/[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:21:23 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.code-review-ladder |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9C375DDD9B669243A2D78FCD607E894003E4FCF7@bremo-jg> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: code-review-ladder-admin-wool9L35kiek0rBIEb6pKdBc4/[email protected] > [mailto:code-review-ladder-admin-wool9L35kiek0rBIEb6pKdBc4/[email protected]]On Behalf Of > Struan Donald > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:01 AM > To: Code Review > Subject: [code-review] WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C >=20 > Hi, > Any thoughts/improvements/whatever on the attached? > FWIW it validates URIs against the W3Cs markup validator. > cheers > Struan At first cursory reading, I'd change "schema" to "protocol". You specify that "url.com" won't work, but that "http://url.com" will. The "http://" is the HyperText Transfer Protocol, just as "ftp://" means = File Transfer Protocol and "https://" is the HyperText Transfer Protocol = Secure. I haven't heard it referred to as a "schema". That makes me = think of databases. :) ***** "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity = to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, = and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination = or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this = information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is = prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender = and delete the material from all computers." 113