RE: [code-review] WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C
"Hodges, Paul" <Paul.Hodges-zv7RHi0Am8a1Z/[email protected]> Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:06:50 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.code-review-ladder |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9C375DDD9B669243A2D78FCD607E894003E4FCFB@bremo-jg> |
> From: Richard Clamp [mailto:richardc-PThgL6HeIXdH4x6Dk/[email protected]] > Every time I see code like this: > > if (cond) { > # if code > return $thing; > } > else { > # else code > } > > I get a ringing bell that says "hey, the programmer doesn't understand > what the flow of control is here", and I find that some other shoe > drops some time soon after. > > A more pleasing form (for me) is this: > > if (cond) { > # if code > return $thing; > } > # else code > > As at least expressed that way it seems that you know what return does > for you. I prefer the more concise return if cond; # other stuff .... Same principle, though. ***** "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.61"