RE: [code-review] LIST FUNCTIONALITY REQUEST
Kristofer Hoch <kristoferhoch-/[email protected]> Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.code-review-ladder |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Damn, Consider it dropped. I have never know of this particular landmine. Sorry all. Kristofer --- Garrett Goebel <[email protected]> wrote: > Kristofer Hoch wrote: > > > > I don't know about yall, but I think it'd be nice if I hit the > > 'reply' button and the reply when directly to the list. What do > yall > > think? > > This topic is a religious powder keg, and best dropped immediately. > Accept > that it is the mailing list owners perogative... > > http://www.ibiblio.org/oswg/oswg-nightly/oswg/en_US.ISO_8859-1/articles/mlad > vice/mladvice.html#AEN172 > > 4.1.4. Reply-to headers > At some stage in every list's life, someone will suggest that you > make the > Reply-to header point back to the list. Don't do it. There are > numerous > technical reasons not to, which are fully documented in Chip > Rosenthal's > essay entitled "Reply-to munging considered harmful" at > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html. > > Simply speaking, setting the Reply-to address back to the list can > cause > more problems than it solves. Rather than breaking things in this > manner, > you should try to educate people by pointing them at the > aforementioned > article. > > Let me say it again: DO NOT SET THE REPLY-TO POINTING BACK TO YOUR > LIST! I > really mean it. > > Actually, I know experienced list admins who will sometimes munge the > Reply-to header, but they usually have very good reasons for it. > Don't do it > unless you've read and considered the article mentioned above and > really > know what you're doing. The circumstances in which this is done are > usually > when there is a small list in a homogenous environment (eg the staff > of a > small company), or when you have a social list for non-technical > people who > go beyond "non-technical" and into the realm of "clue resistant". In > that > case, you have my condolences, and I concede that your prime > directive > should be to save yourself stress and headaches. > > > > -- > Garrett Goebel > IS Development Specialist > > ScriptPro Direct: 913.403.5261 > 5828 Reeds Road Main: 913.384.1008 > Mission, KS 66202 Fax: 913.384.2180 > www.scriptpro.com garrett at scriptpro dot com > > ===== -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s+:++ a C++ UL++ US+ P+++ L++ W+++ w PS PE t++ b+ G e r+++ z++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com