Re: Naming the @{[]} operator

FWIW, I'm writing a book on the subject:  
http://use.perl.org/~cog/journal/30129

Mailing list is here: http://perl-hackers.net/mailman/listinfo/cog-book

jac


On Jul 7, 2006, at 11:02 PM, Andrew Savige wrote:

> --- Alan Young wrote:
>> I missed any discussion on this, and searching for this series of
>> characters is fruitless.
>
> Here's an attempt at a definitive reference list for Perl's
> secret operators. I blame cog and BooK.
>
> Original fwp thread on secret operators:
>
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03431.html
>
> Perl monk node on secret operators:
>
>  http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=426037
>
> YAPC::EU 2005 talk: Obfuscation, Golfing and Secret Operators:
>
>  http://conferences.yapceurope.org/2005/talk/194
>
> BTW, are the slides available for this talk?
>
> London Perl Workshop Perl Black Magic talk:
>
>
> http://www.london.pm.org/lpw-2004/talks/jose_alves_de_castro- 
> perl_black_magic_enhanced.pdf
>
> OGSOP book announced: Obfuscation, Golfing and Secret Operators in Perl
>
>  http://use.perl.org/~cog/journal/30129
>
> /-\
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online friends  
> http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
------------------------------------------
José Castro <[email protected]>
log <www.log.pt>
Tel: +351 21 330 42 20
Fax: +351 21 330 42 19
Av. Duque de Ávila nº23, 1000-138 Lisboa
------------------------------------------