Re: The sperm secret operator: is it new?

> >> While doing some tests/research on secret operators, I stumbled upon
 >> this >> one in my one-liners:
 >> >> ~~<>
 >> >> Obviously, this should be named "the sperm operator".
 >> Looks more like a "kite" operator to me.
> Does that mean I have a dirty mind?

At least not dirtier than the inventor of the =3D()=3D (unless that was y=
ou ;)
... anyway I think it'll be adopted better as "kite", and well also, wher=
e=20
did you see a four-squared sperm? :)=20

--=20
Sincerely,
	Dmitry Karasik