Re: fractional cents

"A. Pagaltzis" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.fun
Message-ID <20040421205530.GA5619@klangraum>
* John Douglas Porter <[email protected]> [2004-04-20 08:39]:
> It seems to me that the precision desired should depend on
> context, and nothing else.  And that being the case...
> 
>   printf $fractional_cents ? '%7.3f' : '%7.sf', $amt;
> 
> irrespective of the value of $amt.  Why is this not right?

What you have written is neutral with regards to the issue I was
referring to.

If you do this by looking at $amt, then your method must be
mathematical, because chopping characters in the string
representation of the unrounded $amt might occasionally lead to
results different from what the mathematical method would have
produced with rounding involved.

If you already do have a string representation consistent with a
rounded $amt, f.ex using sprintf, then it's safe to mangle this
as a string.

So the key here would be what expression decides the value of
your $fractional_cents boolean. And I as I posted a bit before,
it *can* (of course) be done using just math.

-- 
Regards,
Aristotle
 
"If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't take life seriously enough."
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.