Re: Comments on Cipher Minigolf

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.golf
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Ton Hospel wrote:
> 
> Both cases were because I had no IP connectivity, and when I got back
> online saw that a golf was running again. I did think about it for a few
> hours and actually had a few 64's, but didn't submit it since it wouldn't
> be representative compared to people who thought about it for 3 days.

Let's see ... 64 would have been 95 points and that would have brought
down your average score, is that it? I think you would have represented
yourself quite well against this field of competitors :) There's always
3 days of post-mortem to come up with new tricks.

The 64 wouldn't have helped me anyway, only a 62 or better would have
reduced the score of my nearest competitor :)

Doesn't it bother you that MTV has moved into the top spot for most
holes played at 32?

I hope you have IP next round.

Michael
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.