Re: CGI::Application status update from the maintainer

Hi Brett

On 11/09/12 00:05, B. Estrade wrote:

> I think what I was thinking of for a "more developed" plugin system is
> to provide a way to better manage when plugins are fired wrt hooks.
>
> For example, have an "after" or "before" type of modifier when
> registering a callback would be nice.  Even better would be a way to
> easily manage the handler queue associated with each hook.  It's not
> entirely clear to me how to ensure that handlerA will fire before
> handlerB; I also know from reading the documentation that a class
> level handler will fire before instance level handlers.  This might be
> by design or just a consequence of the implementation; however being
> able to control the handler execution order would be useful I believe.

I don't mind if you choose to continue with CGI::Application rather than 
switch to CGI::Snapp, but you should be aware that in the latter's 
documentation, I went to great lengths to spell out this matter. 
See/Read for yourself my explanation:

https://metacpan.org/module/CGI::Snapp#The-Flow-of-Control

HTH.

-- 
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/
Ph: 0421 920 622

#####  CGI::Application community mailing list  ################
##                                                            ##
##  To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options,  ##
##  visit:  http://www.erlbaum.net/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp    ##
##                                                            ##
##  Web archive:   http://www.erlbaum.net/pipermail/cgiapp/   ##
##  Wiki:          http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/                 ##
##                                                            ##
################################################################