Re: [CDBI] Many-to-Many - why no CDBI::Relationship?
"Ryan Tate" <lists-UNebACArQA1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.class-dbi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/23/06, Matt S Trout <dbix-class-uY5y5/[email protected]> wrote: > You'll find there's a Big Obvious Comment in the source to by HasManyToMany > crediting HasManyOrdered; it was basically a "derive, cleanup, dump features I > don't need and add a couple of bits and pieces I do" job. OK, I'll check it out! I don't need the "ordered" part at the moment ... RT