Re: [CDBI] Re: construct sucks.
"Ryan Tate" <lists-UNebACArQA1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.class-dbi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/28/06, Matt S Trout <dbix-class-uY5y5/[email protected]> wrote: > You might want to go "oh shit, data's > changed under us, HELP" rather than just carrying on and potentially > flattening new data with an older update. That was my thinking. On the other hand, existing behavior is to NOT go "oh shit" in this circumstance and just let it happen (since the conflict is never detected in the first place). I assume Tony will have his own thoughts on this.