Re: [CDBI] Re: Fast fetch-on-demand iterator complete

Michael G Schwern <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.class-dbi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> Michael Schwern wrote:
>> I've completed work on the fetch-on-demand iterator. You can get the patch
>> here: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=24959
> 
> I like the overall implementation very much. Very unobtrusive. The
> refactoring and ->iterator_class(...) class method is very much in the spirit
> of Class::DBI.

FWIW iterator_class() was already there.


> I do have a few nits to pick, however:
> 
> I suggest wrapping all pod lines to less than 80 columns and removing any
> hard tabs in pod, such as in the following line:
> 
> "Class::DBI ships with several iterator classes.	 See L<SEE ALSO> here in this document for a list.	Others may be found on CPAN."
> 
> Style nits: "unless( ... )" should be "unless (...)" and "if( ... )" should be
> "if (...)" to adhere to (presumably Tony's at this point) overall Class::DBI
> programming style.

My eyes are crossing right now.  If someone would be so good as to do this for me and resubmit the patch that would be great.


>> It requires an Ima::DBI patch to allow finer control of the statement
>> handle cache. http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=25073
> 
> This is long overdue and *much* needed. If we could get Perrin's
> mod_perl-related patch integrated too, we'd have a damn fine Ima::DBI release
> here.

Tony's gone dark the last two weeks, presumably setting up his new job.  I'll poke him with sticks.


> And
> "OnDemand::Opportunistic" seems overly long. Maybe just "Hybrid" instead?

No arguments that its long.  I thought of using Hybrid, but it doesn't say what its a hybrid of.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.