Re: Relevance of ChildHandles

Jens Rehsack <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 08.05.13 00:05, Tim Bunce wrote:
[...]
> At this stage in the life of the DBI I think it's reasonable to assume
> that there isn't a leak in the DBI itself. If there was then a lot of
> people would be affected and complaining about it.

I think this assumption is heavily wrong. From my jobs I learned one
thing the last years: do it quick. To illustrate what I mean saying
that, see following exampple.

In a particular project we had the issue, that every monday morning
our web-interface was inoperable because of an invalid $dbh (which
was cached). The question from our manager was: can you say in 10
minutes why and how to fix and can you guarantee fix it until lunch?
Otherwise - implement a cron controlled web-server restart each
morning at 5.

Because of personal interests I debugged later into it (and fixed
it a few weeks later - "guaranteed") ...

What I'm trying to say - when administrators see there web-server
machines running out of memory, the implement a scheduled restart
in the pool of machines.

I really don't know business relying on web-services running
qualified monitoring with performance measurement (some do, but
don't know what they measure and finally one company really does).

Sorry for complaining ;)

Cheers
-- 
Jens Rehsack
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.