Re: Function Calling Methods

I want to throw my support behind this idea in principle, that principle 
being that it is important to be able to invoke database stored routines
  efficiently and easily.  In my case, considering that a dominant paradigm 
of Muldis D is to put all database access code in database stored routines, 
so having less indirection for implementing the language over existing 
DBMSs should only be helpful.  Also as commented, the solution should 
support inputing or returning arbitrary configurations of data, eg, 
multiple subject-to-update parameters, as SQL itself supports. -- Darren Duncan