Re: DBD::File missing f_ext

Jeff Zucker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.sybase.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> Attached patch implements the following:
>
>   f_dir => "/data/csv/foo",
>   f_ext => ".csv",
>   f_ext => ".csv/i",  # Case ignore on extension, use given on write
>   f_ext => ".csv/r",  # Extension is required, ignore other files in
>   f_ext => ".csv/ri", #  f_dir. Options can be combined
>
>   
I find that overly complicated, doesn't solve much, and could be done 
easily with a single loop statement in Perl.  The case stuff I would 
find particularly confusing since f_dir and file names (not table names) 
will need to remain case sensitive on *nix regardless of what you do 
with the sensitivity of the extension - SQL table names must remain 
insensitive in all cases so this method of treating a filename as a 
tablename would make the entire situation quite confusing.  The reason I 
say it doesn't solve much is that it only really works if you have a 
single CSV format (e.g. if you have files that use a semi-colon eol 
you'll need to specify them with $dbh->{csv_tables} attribute anyway.  
Also it doesn't solve the issue of finding a list of tables - a fuller 
patch would connect the specifiying of f_dir and f_ext with the 
$dbh->tables() method.  I guess my main approach is that filenames and 
tablenames are two different things and that this patch obscures that 
whereas most users will be better off by realizing that they are better 
off making an explicit association between file names and table names 
with $dbh->{csv_tables}->{file}.  So, let me think about this patch, I'm 
not ready to decide today.  I will definitely apply your previous 
patches from rt, thanks for those.

TIM or others - what do you think?

Also, thanks for your offer to take over DBD:CSV.  I may sometime take 
you up on that but am not ready yet, I'd prefer to keep it as long as I 
have DBD::File, DBD::AnyData, and SQL::Statement since they are all so 
intimately related.   Is there a way we can be co-maintainers? Can I 
give you PAUSE uploading rights so that you could directly upload 
patches we both agree are good changes?

Thanks for your improvements to the module.

-- 
Jeff
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.