Re: [Dbix-class] request to become co-maintainer of DBD::SQLite

This is a reply to a post on the dbix-class list.  However, if there is going to 
be ongoing discussion I prefer it happen on the dbi-dev list, since dbi-dev just 
seems the most on topic, I think.

Goro Fuji wrote:
> Just now I am concidering to maintain DBD::SQLite, and I have ideas about that:
> (1) to separate SQLite from DBD::SQLite (not to be bundled), which
> will also separate ploblems of SQLite from those of DBD::SQLite.
> (2) to make a new module Alien::SQLite (see other Alien::* modules),
> which will allow different versions of SQLite.
> (3) to allow "use DBD::SQLite 1.15 -sqlite_version => q(3.6.8)" for testing.
> 
> What do you think of it?

That sounds like it could be a good idea on paper.  I'm not sure I know yet the 
degree of changes it would involve.  By default I think I'll start off with the 
fewest changes, also now most likely using Audrey Tang's amalgamation as the 
point of departure, but DBD::SQLite could also go the way you say.  I think this 
is an idea best discussed on dbi-dev or if you want to prototype and present 
your idea there please do so.  There are probably other issues to consider that 
people may bring up.

Thank you. -- Darren Duncan