Re: _concat_hash_sorted()

On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Darren Duncan wrote:

> But from what you've described in your blog to be the state of  
> affairs, I think that having a distinct DBIx::Connector module is a  
> good idea, versus embedding that functionality in a larger DBI-using  
> module.

Yes, that's the idea.

> I've never been in a situation to use cached connections before, but  
> this module looks like it could be a good default practice to use  
> when using DBI, if it seems to make connection caching work more  
> correctly.  Unless there might be some agreement for DBI itself to  
> use those semantics (but it hadn't already).

I think that the DBI has tried to stay away from dealing with forking  
and threading, though all the special-casing for Apache::DBI must've  
been a PITA. I'm plan to use DBIx::Connector for all my projects going  
forward.

Best,

David