Re: DBI development release ready to ship

Tim Bunce <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.sybase.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:18:15PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce <[email protected]>:
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> >> 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce <[email protected]>:
> >> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> >> >> Hi Tim,
> >> >>
> >> >> from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped
> >> >> as next development release.
> >> >
> >> > Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t
> >> > Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t
> >> >
> >> > Should they be in the MANIFEST?
> >>
> >> They should, my fault. I'll do it now.
> >>
> >> > > Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of
> >> > > SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads.
> >> >
> >> > Please tell me more about this. Why synchronize?
> >>
> >> DBI has test-depends (and recommendation) for SQL::Statement 1.28
> >> and S::S has test-depends on DBI 1.612.
> >
> > I think the DBI shouldn't have test-depends for SQL::Statement.
> > The recommendation is fine though.
> 
> It has a test-depends - but the tests are skipped if S::S is not available.
> My though was in the direction "I want to have the feedback from CPAN
> testers regarding the new S::S".

I don't see a test-depends on S::S in the DBI's Makefile.PL.
Only a recommends (plus a conflicts for SQL::Statement => 1.27).

> >> Some tests in DBI work only with SQL::Statement (and vice versa).
> >
> > Okay, but they're skipped if SQL::Statement isn't defined (right?)
> > so the tests don't strictly *depend* on SQL::Statement.
> 
> No, they're simply skipped (or fallback to DBI::SQL::Nano) without
> SQL::Statement.  I want to see if there're more incompatibilities like
> that one from Birmingham.pm.  Those are not discovered without SQL::Statement :)
>
> Can you upload a DBI-1.611_92 now (with 2 more tests and the fixed Changes)?

Done. But there's no need to wait for those results as there are some
windows failures on 1.611_91 that need fixing:

http://matrix.cpantesters.org/?dist=DBI%201.611_91;reports=1;os=MSWin32

Tim.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.