Re: Take care with version numbers (eg DBD::Pg)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


> Looks like it should have been 2.6.0:

Yep, there is no such thing as version 2.6 of DBD::Pg.

> I think, the best way out would be a hard consensus and 
> CPAN reindex.

Consensus on what exactly?

Perhaps it would be good if the mixing of two and three 
dot versions on the same check was treated as a severe 
error and caused an automatic FAIL report.

I can't see a case where using both forms would ever be desired.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane [email protected]
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201007081302
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkw2Bf4ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsitqACg/ci1wC6pC3KIsQ1EXctbhg57
/jcAnRrGkbzhvcoIZTZy6UlGdUN8uuDW
=I0v4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----