Re: Take care with version numbers (eg DBD::Pg)

On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:

> My take on this, for the record, is to prefer two part numbers
> in the form X.YYY where YYY never has a trailing zero.

And thus may be X.Y or X.YY as well.

> Short, sweet, simple.

Yeah, I'm with you. All of my modules use this format. (Except Bricolage. Don't ask.)

> Tim.
> 
> p.s. No one commented on the DBI going from 1.609 to 1.611 :)

That's one louder, isn't it?

David