Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:21:53 +0200, Jens Rehsack
<[email protected]> wrote:

> > Does that sound ok?  
> 
> Partially for me.
> 
> 1) I don't know which svn version is used to store the repository,
>    so we might run into trouble when merging from the trunk.
> 2) We should try to communicate about release cycles anyway,
>    because it doesn't makes much sense to have the sqlengine
>    branch ready for release a week after a fresh release is out.
> 3) Me might tag something as stable and ready for release, but
>    want develop more (because we have time, desires or what ever),
>    so we need to branch (for fixing) ...
> 
> But it sounds like a way we can walk to see where it leads us.
> And probably I'm to pessimistic at the moment :)
> 
> Probably we need more branches - depending on the task, let's
> see.

Tim, would it be OK to release dev versions of `other' branches to CPAN?
So the CPANTESTERS can pick up what goes wrong

-- 
H.Merijn Brand  http://tux.nl      Perl Monger  http://amsterdam.pm.org/
using 5.00307 through 5.12 and porting perl5.13.x on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00,
11.11, 11.23, and 11.31, OpenSuSE 10.3, 11.0, and 11.1, AIX 5.2 and 5.3.
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/           http://www.test-smoke.org/
http://qa.perl.org      http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/