Re: Possible memory leak in DBI

"Martin J. Evans" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.sybase.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It would appear this problem and possibly other leaks are attracting quite a lot of attention now. Someone else just posted another cpan rating mentioning leaks at:

  http://cpanratings.perl.org/dist/DBD-Pg#8254

I narrowed down one of the problems (below) but it is beyond me now - sorry.

Martin
-- 
Martin J. Evans
Easysoft Limited
http://www.easysoft.com

On 13/01/11 18:53, Martin J. Evans wrote:
> I briefly looked at the DBD::Pg rt ticket https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=60863 and I'm not sure this is a bug in DBD::Pg and think it might be in DBI. Since ShowErrorStatement set causes the leak and unset the leak goes away I isolated it to some code in DBI.xs:
>
> if ( DBIc_has(imp_xxh, DBIcf_ShowErrorStatement)
> && !is_unrelated_to_Statement
> && (DBIc_TYPE(imp_xxh) == DBIt_ST || ima_flags & IMA_SHOW_ERR_STMT)
> && (statement_svp = hv_fetch((HV*)SvRV(h), "Statement", 9, 0))
> && statement_svp && SvOK(*statement_svp)
> ) {
> SV **svp = 0;
> sv_catpv(msg, " [for Statement \"");
> sv_catsv(msg, *statement_svp);
>
> /* fetch from tied outer handle to trigger FETCH magic */
> /* could add DBIcf_ShowErrorParams (default to on?) */
> #ifdef THIS_ONE_STOPS_LEAK
> if (!(ima_flags & IMA_HIDE_ERR_PARAMVALUES)) {
> svp = hv_fetch((HV*)DBIc_MY_H(imp_xxh),"ParamValues",11,FALSE);
> if (svp && SvMAGICAL(*svp))
> mg_get(*svp); /* XXX may recurse, may croak. could use eval */
> }
> #endif
> if (svp && SvRV(*svp) && SvTYPE(SvRV(*svp)) == SVt_PVHV && HvKEYS(SvRV(*svp))>0 ) {
> #ifndef THESE_TWO_WITHOUT_ABOVE_DOES_NOT_STOP_LEAK
> SV *param_values_sv = sv_2mortal(_join_hash_sorted((HV*)SvRV(*svp), "=",1, ", ",2, 1, -1));
> #endif
> sv_catpv(msg, "\" with ParamValues: ");
> #ifndef THESE_TWO_WITHOUT_ABOVE_DOES_NOT_STOP_LEAK
> sv_catsv(msg, param_values_sv);
> #endif
> sv_catpvn(msg, "]", 1);
> }
> else {
> sv_catpv(msg, "\"]");
> }
> }
>
> I was suspicious about _join_hash_sorted but it appears if you just take THESE_TWO_WITHOUT_ABOVE_DOES_NOT_STOP_LEAK out it still leaks.
>
> If you just take THIS_ONE_STOPS_LEAK (which obviously also takes out the other 2) the leak goes away.
>
> I've not duplicated the problem with any other DBDs as yet but I'm running the exact code in the RT.
>
> I've no idea as yet what the actual problem is.
>
> I was running Perl 5.10.1 on Linux (32bit) but no one who has tried this yet (on multiple Perls in Linux) has failed to see the issue.
>
> With THIS_ONE_STOPS_LEAK defined I get:
>
> martin@bragi:/tmp/DBD-Pg-2.17.2$ perl -I blib/lib -I blib/arch leak.pl
> Cycles: 2000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 4000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 6000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 8000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 10000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 12000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 14000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 16000 Proc size: 13700K
> Cycles: 18000 Proc size: 13700K
>
> and a stock DBI from trunk) I get:
>
> martin@bragi:/tmp/DBD-Pg-2.17.2$ perl -I blib/lib -I blib/arch leak.pl
> Cycles: 2000 Proc size: 16792K
> Cycles: 4000 Proc size: 19892K
> Cycles: 6000 Proc size: 22980K
> Cycles: 8000 Proc size: 26200K
> Cycles: 10000 Proc size: 29296K
> Cycles: 12000 Proc size: 32376K
> Cycles: 14000 Proc size: 35472K
> Cycles: 16000 Proc size: 38692K
> Cycles: 18000 Proc size: 41796K
>
> Martin
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.