Re: DBI drivers by duck-typing
David Nicol <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.sybase.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFwScO-ADhBKkv_13kA=fXLbqGBcyGcU8=A9wjMbBoY6bs3JdQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Darren Duncan <[email protected]> wrote: > > So what say you? > > -- Darren Duncan I think you can do this without any change to DBI. You have your own DBI-like framework; you could declare that anything that passes your conformance suite is compliant, and offer low-impact patches to your favorite DBD modules where the glue is too thick for your aesthetics. How mandatory, currently, is the "mandatory shared codebase?" Are there really traps and snares preventing a different framework from using DBD modules? I'm presuming that there aren't; ICBW.