Re: In need of a few official prefixes
"Martin J. Evans" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.dbi.sybase.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Easysoft Limited |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/04/12 14:29, Brendan Byrd wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Tim Bunce<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:38:38PM -0500, Brendan Byrd wrote: >>> (Sent this a while ago on a work account, but I guess it didn't go through.) >>> >>> I am nearing completion of the following modules: >>> >>> DBD::FusionTables - Mostly complete except for tests/docs; however Google >>> is wanting to fix a lot of their bugs in Fusion Tables before they consider >>> it worth using. >>> >>> DBD::TreeData - Needs docs/tests, but it is so far working great. Just >>> used it to create a few schemas via Catalyst/DBIC. >>> >>> DBD::SNMP - Not quite as complete as it's read-only, but I'm actively >>> working on this right now, so that I can create DBIC schemas from it. >>> >>> How can I get a prefix set up within DBI? These are the unofficial >>> prefixes I’ve been using within the modules: fust, tree, snmp. Can I take >>> these? >> >> fust and snmp seem fine. tree makes me pause for thought as it seems a >> bit too generic. On the other hand I can't think of anything better >> (treed_ or trd_ were the best I could come up with) so go ahead. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Release early, release often! >> >> Remind me to patch DBI once they're released. > > Pong. You can hold off on the fust one, but I still need snmp and tree. > Done Martin -- Martin J. Evans Easysoft Limited http://www.easysoft.com