Re: Bug in die_on_bad_params handling

From: "Matija Grabnar" <[email protected]>
> Setting up the loops would be expensive, since it involves a LOT of data

You may already know this. It would be fairly easy for you to subclass H::T
to use your own modified param method. Modify it to accept a second
parameter:

========
@foo=({bar=>1,baz=>2},{bar=>3,baz=>4});
@die=(1,0);
$t->param(foo=>\@foo, \@die);
========

Then, in the param method's loop have it test the corresponding die
parameter instead of the global setting.

BTW: I think your request makes *a lot* of sense. I'd call it an enhancement
instead of a bug.

Mark



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click