Re: Perl Sasl GSSAPI and
Clif Harden <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.ldap |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Graham Barr wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13 Apr 2009, at 17:23, Dale Moore wrote:
>>> I recommend that if we are going to use Net::LDAP get the peerhost,
>>> and use it as part of the service name, that we modify Net::LDAP to
>>> do the reverse DNS and not expect GSSAPI to do it. Or we change our
>>> approach in dealing with hosts with round-robin ip addresses.
>>
>> The reason why both MIT and Heimdal are moving away from doing
>> reverse lookups is that it introduces a security dependency on the
>> DNS. Given that (in general) the DNS is not secure, moving the lookup
>> elsewhere is a retrograde step. Net::LDAP should simply pass the
>> server name that it has been asked to connect to through to the
>> GSSAPI library. The correct place to handling name resolution issues
>> is on the server, or (once referral support is in place) on the KDC.
>
> I think the flaw is in having Net::LDAP decide the hostname to pass to
> Auth::SASL
>
> Currently an Authen::SASL object is passed to ->bind and bind will
> call $sasl->client_new("ldap",$connected_name);
>
> Whatever the "correct" method anyone may think, that is not going to
> work for some. What I propose is the option for the caller to call
> ->client_new and pass the result to bind. ie, if passed object
> ->isa('Authen::SASL') then we call client_new as we do now, otherwise
> we use the given object as the connection object.
>
> This would remain backwards compatible with what is there now, but
> give greater control to those user that the current scheme does not
> work for.
>
> Graham.
>
>
Sounds like a reasonable plan to me.
Regards,
Clif Harden [email protected]