Re: conns debug only in http10.pm - why?

On Thu, 04 May 2006 11:03:22 -0700, Gisle Aas wrote:
> Or just use Ethereal or a similar network sniffer program.  That's
> what I currently use and the main reason I have not bothered with
> conns() calls for any recent code.  They are not completely free for
> those that don't try to turn on this debugging either, so I would
> prefer to leave it like this.  

An extra subroutine call, hash lookup, and boolean comparison per read()
and write() is onerous?

The debug-conns interface is appealingly clean.  Can we save it? 

-- 
Peter Scott