Re: About LWP in general??
"Eli M. Blatt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.lwp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
sorry to post this to the list, but i've tried and failed to unsubscribe from this list. can someone please help?? eli On Sep 12, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Reinier Post wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, chris choi wrote: >> Hi >> I'm new to Perl, but considering writing web robots/Spiders in >> Perl, but I'm >> not too sure if the LWP is out-dated or something cause I haven't >> heard >> anything about LWP recently, so I was wondering if you guys know >> if there is >> a new thing to write WEB robots with on PERL?? > > No, the LWP is not at all outdated, and very much the standard Web > client library > for Perl, as far as I'm aware. There is little development > activity goes on, but > in this case, as far as I'm aware, this is not a sign of > abandonment, but of > maturity: the library is finished and does what it was designed to do. > Gisle Aas, its maintainer, monitors this list for feature requests and > bug reports, and occasionally creates a new LWP version in response. > > Yes, there are newer libraries specifically for writing Web robots > in Perl; > some of them are in CPAN, and are frequently mentioned here; > WWW::Mechanize > is the name I see most often. These libraries all use LWP, as far > as I'm aware, > and you are definitely advised to use them instead of building your > own directly > on top of LWP. However, I do not use any of them at the moment, so > I cannot > give you more information. > >> thanks >> Chris > > -- > Reinier Post > TU Eindhoven