Re: State of the AJAX Union
John J Lee <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.lwp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611201930090.2673@localhost> |
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Christopher Hart wrote: > I know there is a rich history of challenges implementing any kind of > JavaScript interpretation using Mechanize or any other web > scripting/automation utility, but I was wondering if anyone has tried to > focus on "Mechanizing" AJAX? > > I realize this would take at least some degree of JavaScript interpretation > and most likely some kind of internal DOM representation to maintain the No doubt you could profitably concentrate your implementation / bug-fixing effort on the DOM features you're interested in, but I don't think there's any terribly obvious closed subset of the DOM &c. that you could implement and save yourself lots of work as compared with implementing the full monty. > state of the page, and that it's probably extraordinarily challenging. Probably only extraordinarily challenging in that it involves lots of work -- that's why nobody has done it :-) > Nonetheless, with the increasing popularity of AJAX, it seems like it > eventually needs to be done. I'm watching more and more of the sites I've > written automation for slowly migrate to AJAX and it's getting increasingly > difficult to work around these designs. [...] Whether or not it "needs" to be done, it won't be, unless somebody steps up to do it. John