Re: State of the AJAX Union

John J Lee <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.lwp
Message-ID <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611201930090.2673@localhost>
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Christopher Hart wrote:

> I know there is a rich history of challenges implementing any kind of
> JavaScript interpretation using Mechanize or any other web
> scripting/automation utility, but I was wondering if anyone has tried to
> focus on "Mechanizing" AJAX?
>
> I realize this would take at least some degree of JavaScript interpretation
> and most likely some kind of internal DOM representation to maintain the

No doubt you could profitably concentrate your implementation / bug-fixing 
effort on the DOM features you're interested in, but I don't think there's 
any terribly obvious closed subset of the DOM &c. that you could implement 
and save yourself lots of work as compared with implementing the full 
monty.


> state of the page, and that it's probably extraordinarily challenging.

Probably only extraordinarily challenging in that it involves lots of work 
-- that's why nobody has done it :-)


> Nonetheless, with the increasing popularity of AJAX, it seems like it
> eventually needs to be done.  I'm watching more and more of the sites I've
> written automation for slowly migrate to AJAX and it's getting increasingly
> difficult to work around these designs.
[...]

Whether or not it "needs" to be done, it won't be, unless somebody steps 
up to do it.


John
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.