Re: suggestion for URI::GoogleChart

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Gisle Aas wrote:

> I would like to avoid this kind of test.  First because that allow me
> to use the native type names directly,

The change doesn't prevent this. You can specify either the native name or 
the alias name.

> the module to support types that the web-service introduce after the
> module was released.

How can I be a BOFH if I let people do what they want, when and how they 
want.  ;-)

But I do understand this point. Making it "mostly future-proof" means less 
work for users and you to maintain it. My change certainly prevents that.

Since it's a one line change, I can easily track the differences between 
my local copy and your official distribution.

> I don't belive passing the wrong type will be a common error.  You
> will need to test the generated URLs anyway and the error will be
> discovered then.

That's how I came up with the suggestion - I used your example in the POD. 
You used "line" instead of "lines" and generated a broken api call.

--Jeff

"You cannot unsay a cruel word." - Unknown