Re: Mail::Audit persistent running

Peter Oliver:
> Uh, what?
> 
> Do you mean that in a "no warranty" kind of a way, or are you telling us
> that Mail::Audit is broken, not to be trusted, and we should all go back 
> to procmail?

I mean that in the "if you're going to whinge and be insultingly ungrateful
that the software I've given you for nothing doesn't work for you when it
blatantly works for the vast majority of us, then I don't want you using my
software and blaming any problems you have with it on me" sense.

Yes, I admit that Mail::Audit might lose some of your mail, as might cosmic
rays and Democrats winning the election, but there's not much point in
bringing it up in discussion unless you're FUDding. Unfortunately, Torsten
insists on FUDding.

Mail::Audit works. You may or may not. :)

-- 
"IT support will, from 1 October 2000, be provided by college and
departmental card locks." - J-P Stacey