Re: Mail::Audit persistent running

Listen up Mail::Audit is working very nicely to me and I hope the 
author despite your idiotic comments is prepared to continue to develop 
it.

Why don't you be a bit more specific about your problems and then 
perhaps some of us may even try to help you.

On Dec 6, 2003, at 1:06 PM, Thorsten Haude wrote:

> Hi,
>
> * Simon Cozens <[email protected]> [2003-12-06 19:51]:
>>> What exactly is your problem, don't you like being critizised in
>>> public? Then you should at take at least *fake* an interest in the 
>>> bug
>>> reports in your software's bug database.
>>
>> I'm fine with criticism, but I don't like being told THIS IS UTTERLY 
>> FATALLY
>> CRIPPLED AND BROKEN when I've been using it *myself* for over two 
>> years with
>> no problems at all.
>
> That's not what I said, don't attack straw men. I said that there are
> bugs which  lose and cripple mail, which is exactly what happened to
> me.
>
> Maybe you should address the problems instead of attacking me?
>
>
>> I think one of us is going to be leaving this list soon, and I'm 
>> reasonably
>> sure it's going to be me. I don't have the energy for this kind of 
>> thing.
>
> Fine, throw me out if don't want to someone to hear about bugs in your
> software. I sincerely hope they don't lose mail.
>
>
> Thorsten
> -- 
> Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President
> should on no account be allowed to do the job.
>     - The Book