Re: Dependency identity crisis

At 14:06 +0000 3/22/04, Simon Cozens wrote:
>Installing Mail-Box-2.054:
>
>  **** Optional Mail::IMAPClient is not installed
>  ---> Do you want to install Mail::IMAPClient? yes/no/all [y] n
>  Warning: prerequisite Mail::IMAPClient 2.2 not found.
>  Installing Mail::IMAPClient to satisfy dependency
>
>Why bother even claiming it's optional?

How about saying:

"Seems like there is another module requiring Mail::IMAPClient, so 
the question whether or not to install Mail::IMAPClient can be 
removed."

?  Seems a lot more friendly to me.


Liz