Re: version-0.77 and You

Gisle Aas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl5.porters,gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.module-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I would suggest that you bump the version number of version to 1.00 so  
that becomes the recommended minimal number instead of an arbitrary  
number like 0.77; making the recommended invocation:

    use version 1.00;  $our $VERSION = qw("v1.2.3");

This still confuses me as I think that:

     use version 1.00;

ought to be handy way to declare your own $VERSION, not about  
requesting a specific version of version.

--Gisle


On Jul 15, 2009, at 20:08 , David Golden wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:13 AM, David Golden <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
> Easiest is just to park it on the QA wiki, I think.  Maybe hang it  
> off the toolchain roadmap page?
>
> A copy of my edits is attached and I've put a copy on the QA Wiki:
>
> http://perl-qa.hexten.net/wiki/index.php/Version_POD
>
> My goal with this structural revision was assuming the people don't  
> read docs (much) so trying to have a very logical top-down structure  
> from the table of contents (as created by search.cpan.org).  I  
> tested the pod on search here: http://search.cpan.org/pod2html
>
> I expanded on the synopses a bit and I also tried to make sure that  
> good practices were reflected consistently and I removed some text  
> about bad practices for brevity. For example, I removed the new()  
> method description since we want to discourage its use anyway.
>
> Most of the text is still John's -- I mostly re-arranged and  
> streamlined.  In a couple areas (parsing & comparison) I wrote new  
> text.  In some other areas (eg. alphas) I copied text from the  
> Internals POD and then edited to fit.
>
> John -- I hope you see this as a step forward.  I think it will be  
> much more prescriptive in describing how people should use  
> version.pm -- and then the more detailed Internals POD is there for  
> those who really need to see it.
>
> -- David
>
> <version.pod>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.