Re: DWIM bundling dependencies

David Golden <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.perl.modules.module-build
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Eric Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would rather that we do it without a net connection, or at least
> ensure that it's the same combination of stuff that the author is
> using.  This is partly why I lean toward a .packlist-based scheme.  You
> can't really make it work at all without pure-perl modules, and there
> are a few other constraints to the whole scheme.  Thus, I think we
> should optimize for solving the Module::Build case (90% solution.)
>
> In other words, at some point you reach a problem where it can't be done
> or is maybe just somewhat difficult.  I suggest that whatever we try to
> do automagically should stop well short of that point.

Like I said, ScanDeps/TraceDeps should work most of the time.
Anything too complicated isn't going to bundle well, anyway.  My point
was that grabbing a META.yml is the only way to be sure -- and only
for non arch specific dependencies, but arch-specific bundling is a
nightmare anyway.

-- David
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.