Re: [rt.cpan.org #50841] Problematic interpretation of multiple underscores

On 10/28/2009 02:55 PM, John Peacock via RT wrote:
> Hmmm, I just had a thought: would it be acceptable to still require that
> after an underscore, you could not have another decimal?  I just thought
> of a way to extend the existing internal representation to support
> unlimited _'s and still keep the alpha code (more or less intact)...

I have the pure-Perl implementation done for this support.  You can now 
have unlimited underscores and it will DTRT.  I need to do the XS 
implementation, as well as make it more resilient.  This should really 
go into the built-in Module::Build::Version class too...

John