Re: Report

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 06:46:37AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Chris 'BinGOs' Williams
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > With the version of Module::Build installed on that smoker (0.35) the action 'prereq_data' should be
> > available for the toolchain to determine which prereqs have been defined in the Build.PL
> 
> EekBoek bundles Module::Build 0.28 in inc.

Oh, I hadn't looked that closely. What a wonderful edge-case.

> 
> This is the issue that the new experimental inc/ bundling with
> inc::latest is intended to avoid.
> 
> I don't know how CPANPLUS should deal with this.  Maybe if
> "prereq_data" fails, you have to fall back to reading _build/prereqs.
> 

Yeah, I'd already suspected that that would be the case, it's currently coded in
CPANPLUS::Dist::Build as an either or scenario. It of course picks up the version of
Module::Build that is currently available (0.35), but when it runs the Build.PL/Build etc
that'll be using the bundled version.

*sigh*

I'll fiddle in a bit and make a new release.

Cheers,

-- 
Chris Williams
aka BinGOs
PGP ID 0x4658671F
http://www.gumbynet.org.uk
==========================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLA+cw7eyMi0ZYZx8RAg2iAJ9Mb5GH/9BdoOVUQf0PY09VNEyvZACeJFf8
vl4gR5JAZSOi1hqLkXWYfK4=
=oR2F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----