Re: somevar = BLOCK and passing switches

well, it won't work that way because I am using it as an anonymous block.. ie.

[%
some_name = BLOCK;
 # ton of data
END;
%]


If I try to call it like so: PROCESS some_name, I get a stack trace which complains about that block not existing.

The way you propose would be the standard block declaration:

BLOCK some_name;

END;

That will work, but the problem is I don't want to process all that info again. I want to process it once then display that output 'n' number of times... except one of those times, I want some data omitted.

thanks



________________________________
 From: Larry Leszczynski <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Templates] somevar = BLOCK and passing switches
 

Hi Summer - 

> [% some_name; token_to_omit =1 %]
> 
> some_name does not respect that variable "token_to_omit"

Did you try:

[% PROCESS some_name token_to_omit=1 %]

(No semicolon after "some_name".)

http://www.template-toolkit.org/docs/manual/Directives.html#section_BLOCK


HTH,
Larry

_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates

_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates