Re: [Boston.pm] use Exporter vs. require Exporter
Mike Small <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.perl.perl-mongers.boston |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bill Ricker <[email protected]> writes: > Non random statistical sample from my harddrive > 3636 require Exporter; > 1234 use Exporter; > 404 use Exporter (); > 338 require Exporter ; > 239 require Exporter; > 225 use Exporter (); > 90 require Exporter; > 86 use Exporter 5.57 'import'; > 75 use Exporter 'import'; > 73 require Exporter; > > and many other spacing variations ... yeah i could canonicalize spacing > but it's close > > Unless the doc's endorse the usage, it's a code smell at a minimum ... > and even if endorsed the comment is a code smell. And yet one that 1234 common modules have if I understand your output correctly. Hmmm, maybe I'll mention it one more time and then let it go. -- Mike Small [email protected] _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm